Why Following the Synthetic Grass Trend in Las Vegas is Worth It
Decreased Upkeep with Synthetic Grass
Synthetic grass has been acquiring appeal among homeowners in Las Las vega for its many benefits. Surviving Las Vegas Summers: The Synthetic Grass Solution . Among one of the most substantial benefits is the lowered maintenance demand, that makes synthetic grass a more convenient and cost-effective choice contrasted to natural lawn.
Preserving a natural yard yard is often a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. In the scorching warmth of Las Vegas, it becomes a lot more difficult. The yard requires regular watering, mowing, fertilizing, and weeding to stay healthy and visually pleasing.
Why Following the Synthetic Grass Trend in Las Vegas is Worth It - Heat resistant turf in Las Vegas: won’t fry your feet or your style.
synthetic grass deals Las Vegas
Las Vegas sports complex turf
synthetic grass Las Vegas
artificial grass sports fields Las Vegas
If overlooked, the grass starts to transform yellow or brownish and might even pass away, which would require reseeding or perhaps complete substitute of the grass.
On the other hand, synthetic grass practically gets rid of these concerns. It remains flawlessly eco-friendly and rich all year round, regardless of the weather. There is no need for routine watering, which not only saves effort and time but also contributes to water preservation - a significant problem in areas like Las Vegas. The only water need would be occasional rinsing to keep it tidy and dust-free.
Moreover, with synthetic grass, there is no demand for trimming or fertilizing. It continues to be at the excellent height for life, and theres no danger of it overgrowing or harboring weeds. This not just decreases the time invested in yard upkeep yet likewise eliminates the expense of acquiring and preserving a lawnmower or getting fertilizers.
Artificial turf is likewise much more resilient and hard-wearing than all-natural grass.
Why Following the Synthetic Grass Trend in Las Vegas is Worth It -
Las Vegas fake turf for rooftops—your new favorite hangout is 20 stories high.
Las Vegas patio grass turf
Artificial lawn care in Las Vegas means less raking, more relaxing.
Say goodbye to mowing in 110-degree heat—synthetic grass Las Vegas keeps your yard green without breaking a sweat.
It can stand up to hefty foot website traffic and rigorous play tasks without obtaining broken or harmed. This indicates you wont have to fret about replacing or fixing certain sections of your grass, which is one more common upkeep job with natural lawn.
The decreased maintenance need with synthetic grass gives homeowners in Las Las vega with more time to enjoy their exterior areas, instead of spending quality time keeping them. It also implies substantial price savings in the long run.
Why Following the Synthetic Grass Trend in Las Vegas is Worth It -
Heat resistant turf in Las Vegas: won’t fry your feet or your style.
fake grass for balconies Las Vegas
Las Vegas backyard makeover turf
In a city like Las Vegas, where the environment is extreme, synthetic grass proves to be a smart and valuable choice for homeowners, supplying an evergreen, low-maintenance grass that looks and feels similar to natural lawn.
Ecological Benefits of Changing to Synthetic Grass
As Las Vegas continues to experience the influences of an altering climate and boosting water scarcity, it is becoming important for residents and businesses to discover cutting-edge means to save water. One such means is via the fostering of artificial turf or synthetic grass. This option not just supplies aesthetic charm and reduced upkeep however additionally lugs substantial ecological benefits.
One of the most noticeable ecological benefits of changing to artificial turf is water preservation.
Why Following the Synthetic Grass Trend in Las Vegas is Worth It -
Las Vegas allergy friendly turf
low maintenance grass Paradise NV
synthetic turf for apartment buildings Las Vegas
Conventional yard yards require a hefty amount of water to stay green and healthy and balanced, particularly in the desert environment of Las Vegas. According to the Southern Nevada Water Authority, each square foot of natural grass replaced by synthetic grass conserves 55 gallons of water annually. Therefore, by changing to artificial turf, Las Vegas citizens can considerably decrease their water usage, which is vital in a city where water is a priceless source.
Synthetic grass also eliminates the demand for damaging chemicals and fertilizers. The majority of natural lawns need chemicals, fertilizers, and herbicides to maintain their appearance and wellness. These materials commonly permeate right into the ground, polluting the groundwater and influencing the local vegetation and animals detrimentally. With artificial turf, these chemicals are unneeded, making it a safer selection for the environment.
One more considerable ecological benefit of synthetic grass is its durability and durability. Unlike all-natural yard, artificial turf does not call for reseeding or substitute because of weather modifications. This durability lowers the resources used for the continuous maintenance and substitute of all-natural grass.
In regards to air top quality, man-made grass supplies clear benefits as well. Conventional grass call for routine mowing, which launches pollutants into the environment. The U.S Epa keeps in mind that gas-powered mower add significantly to air pollution. With synthetic grass, no mowing is required, removing these emissions completely.
Finally, synthetic grass helps deal with soil disintegration. In locations where the dirt is susceptible to disintegration, especially in desert climates like Las Vegas, artificial turf can provide much-needed security. The support product on synthetic grass assists maintain dirt in place, avoiding disintegration and promoting better environmental health and wellness.
Finally, the button to synthetic grass in Las Las vega supplies several environmental advantages. From water conservation to air high quality renovation, artificial turf verifies to be a viable, environmentally friendly service, particularly in areas facing water shortage and environment adjustment. As Las Las vega residents remain to seek means to reduce their environmental impact, the fostering of synthetic grass will likely come to be a progressively preferred selection.
Versatility and Aesthetic Charm of Artificial Turf in Las Las Vega
Synthetic grass, generally referred to as artificial turf, has gotten tremendous popularity in the arid, desert city of Las Las vega. In a city where natural yard is challenging to expand and preserve as a result of water scarcity and extreme heat, artificial turf provides an attractive and functional option. The flexibility and aesthetic appeal of synthetic grass are among the top 10 advantages of using this synthetic surface area in Las Vegas.
Lets start by reviewing the adaptability of synthetic grass. One of the main advantages of artificial turf is that it can be set up anywhere, despite the climate or surface. This is particularly beneficial in Las Vegas, where the atmosphere is not conducive to the growth of natural yard. Artificial turf can be mounted on rooftops, outdoor patios, around swimming pool areas, pet runs, sporting activities fields, and playgrounds, to name a few. It is also a favorite option for golf links and bowling greens because of its also, smooth surface. This versatility indicates you can have a lush, green lawn all year round, irrespective of the weather or water restrictions.
One more considerable advantage of synthetic grass is its aesthetic charm. Unlike natural turf, artificial turf remains lively and eco-friendly throughout the year, boosting the look of your home or business. It offers a tidy, neatly polished look that is difficult to attain with natural turf, especially in a desert climate. The artificial turf offered today is created to look like real lawn, making it virtually tantamount from the real point. Additionally, it does not fade under sunshine or transform brownish throughout dry spells, guaranteeing your lawn looks appealing and inviting whatsoever times.
Additionally, artificial turf can be customized to match your particular requirements. It is readily available in numerous shades, lengths, and appearances, permitting you to create a special and customized outdoor room. Whether you desire a soft, deluxe lawn for your youngsters to play on or a long lasting, hard-wearing surface area for high-traffic areas, there is an artificial turf product to meet your needs.
Why Following the Synthetic Grass Trend in Las Vegas is Worth It - Las Vegas backyard makeover turf
custom turf designs Boulder City
Las Vegas event turf rentals
artificial turf for schools Las Vegas
In conclusion, the versatility and aesthetic allure of synthetic grass make it a superb choice for homes and businesses in Las Vegas. Not just does it supply a functional, low-maintenance alternative to all-natural lawn, yet it also enhances the appearance of your property, making it extra appealing and welcoming. So, if youre taking into consideration updating your outside room, synthetic grass can be the best remedy.
Why Following the Synthetic Grass Trend in Las Vegas is Worth It -
poolside artificial grass Las Vegas
Las Vegas backyard makeover turf: because gravel is not a lifestyle.
low water turf solutions Las Vegas
Longevity and Durability: Just How Synthetic Grass Outlasts All-natural Grass
When it concerns the long life and toughness of grass, artificial turf plainly outshines its natural equivalent. This is especially evident in a city like Las Las vega, where the severe desert environment can ruin natural lawns. In contrast, artificial turf stays lively and rich all year round, regardless of weather conditions. This essay seeks to highlight exactly how synthetic grass lasts longer than natural lawn, hence making it among the leading advantages of utilizing artificial turf in Las Las vega.
Natural turf requires a great deal of upkeep to keep it looking fresh and eco-friendly. It needs regular watering, mowing, feeding, and re-seeding. Even with all this treatment, it can still fall victim to diseases, pests, and the scorching Las Vegas warm. The durability of natural yard is commonly endangered by these elements, bring about a damaged and patchy grass that is neither appealing nor functional.
On the various other hand, synthetic grass, likewise called synthetic grass, provides exceptional longevity and durability. It is made from top notch, durable materials that can endure hefty foot web traffic, intense warm, and various other rough conditions. This implies that it remains undamaged and vivid for years, calling for little to no maintenance. In fact, many synthetic grass is made to last for over a decade, which is significantly longer than what can be anticipated from natural lawn.
An additional key element that contributes to the long life of synthetic grass is its resistance to bugs and diseases. Unlike all-natural yard, artificial lawn does not offer a habitat for insects, neither does it suffer from typical grass illness. This gets rid of the demand for chemicals and fungicides, minimizing both maintenance prices and environmental influence.
Moreover, synthetic grass does not require watering to stay eco-friendly. This is a substantial benefit in a desert city like Las Las vega, where water is a priceless source. By going with synthetic grass, house owners can save money on their water costs and contribute to water conservation efforts.
Last but not least, artificial turf can hold up against the damage of sports and various other entertainment activities better than all-natural turf. It supplies a regular having fun surface area that doesn't obtain muddy or develop divots, making it suitable for sporting activities fields and play areas.
To conclude, the long life and longevity of synthetic grass much surpass that of natural lawn, making it a practical and affordable choice for Las Las vega locals. Its immune to harsh weather, insects, and illness, and it does not call for watering or normal upkeep. Whether for a backyard, a sporting activities area, or a public park, artificial turf guarantees an eco-friendly and rich surface area
About Artificial turf
Synthetic grass is a surface area of synthetic fibers made to appear like all-natural lawn, made use of in sports fields, residential lawns and commercial applications that typically make use of lawn. It is much more long lasting than turf and quickly maintained without irrigation or trimming, although periodic cleansing is called for. Stadiums that are considerably covered and/or at high latitudes frequently use artificial turf, as they typically do not have enough sunshine for photosynthesis and replacements for solar radiation are prohibitively expensive and energy-intensive. Negative aspects consist of enhanced risk of injury especially when utilized in sports competitors, along with wellness and environmental concerns regarding the petroleum and toxic chemicals used in its manufacture. Synthetic grass initially gained considerable focus in 1966, when ChemGrass was installed in the year-old Astrodome, developed by Monsanto and rebranded as AstroTurf, currently a generic trademark (signed up to a new proprietor) for any synthetic grass. The first-generation system of shortpile fibers without infill of the 1960s has actually largely been replaced by 2 more. The second features longer fibers and sand infill and the 3rd adds recycled crumb rubber to the sand. Compared to earlier systems, modern synthetic grass a lot more carefully looks like grass in appearance and is likewise considered much safer for athletic competition. Nonetheless, it is still not widely thought about to be equal to lawn. Sports clubs, leagues, unions and individual professional athletes have actually regularly spoken up and wared it, while city governments have actually enacted and imposed legislations limiting and/or outlawing its use.
.
About hybrid grass
Hybrid yard or reinforced natural grass is a product produced by incorporating natural yard yard with reinforcing synthetic fibers. It is made use of for stadiums and training pitches made use of for association football, rugby, arena football and cricket. Reinforced natural turf can additionally be used for events and shows. The synthetic fibres incorporated into the rootzone make the yard stronger and more immune to damages. A first generation of hybrid grass showed up in the 1990s. Turf origins were allowed to link with a mix of dirt and artificial fibers as they grew. 3 main approaches exist to place synthetic fibres in the origin area. The first is to infuse fibers in the sand with a tufting equipment. The 2nd approach is to mix fibers, cork and sand in an automatic plant and to install it after that on the pitch. The system was produced by a laboratory at the Arts et Métiers ParisTech. The 3rd technique is to put a carpeting or floor covering with woven or tufted fibers externally, then to brush in sand or sand blends to keep the fibres in an upright position and lastly to seed yard blends ahead. The all-natural yard origins via the mat and stabilizes the system. These systems are called carpet-based hybrid yard remedies.
.
About Artificial turf
Surface of synthetic fibers made to look like natural grass
Artificial turf with rubber crumb infillSide view of artificial turfDiagram of the structure of modern artificial turfArtificial turf square mats
Artificial turf is a surface of synthetic fibers made to look like natural grass, used in sports arenas, residential lawns and commercial applications that traditionally use grass. It is much more durable than grass and easily maintained without irrigation or trimming, although periodic cleaning is required. Stadiums that are substantially covered and/or at high latitudes often use artificial turf, as they typically lack enough sunlight for photosynthesis and substitutes for solar radiation are prohibitively expensive and energy-intensive. Disadvantages include increased risk of injury especially when used in athletic competition, as well as health and environmental concerns about the petroleum and toxic chemicals used in its manufacture.
Artificial turf first gained substantial attention in 1966, when ChemGrass was installed in the year-old Astrodome, developed by Monsanto and rebranded as AstroTurf, now a generic trademark (registered to a new owner) for any artificial turf.
The first-generation system of shortpile fibers without infill of the 1960s has largely been replaced by two more. The second features longer fibers and sand infill and the third adds recycled crumb rubber to the sand. Compared to earlier systems, modern artificial turf more closely resembles grass in appearance and is also considered safer for athletic competition. However, it is still not widely considered to be equal to grass. Sports clubs, leagues, unions and individual athletes have frequently spoken out and campaigned against it, while local governments have enacted and enforced laws restricting and/or banning its use.
David Chaney, who moved to Raleigh, North Carolina, in 1960 and later served as Dean of the North Carolina State University College of Textiles, headed the team of Research Triangle Park researchers who created the first notable artificial turf. That accomplishment led Sports Illustrated to declare Chaney as the man "responsible for indoor major league baseball and millions of welcome mats."
Artificial turf was first installed in 1964 on a recreation area at the Moses Brown School in Providence, Rhode Island.[1] The material came to public prominence in 1966, when AstroTurf was installed in the Astrodome in Houston, Texas.[1] The state-of-the-art indoor stadium had attempted to use natural grass during its initial season in 1965, but this failed miserably and the field conditions were grossly inadequate during the second half of the season, with the dead grass painted green. Due to a limited supply of the new artificial grass, only the infield was installed before the Houston Astros' home opener in April 1966; the outfield was installed in early summer during an extended Astros road trip and first used after the All-Star Break in July.
The use of AstroTurf and similar surfaces became widespread in the U.S. and Canada in the early 1970s, installed in both indoor and outdoor stadiums used for baseball and football. More than 11,000 artificial turf playing fields have been installed nationally.[2] More than 1,200 were installed in the U.S. in 2013 alone, according to the industry group the Synthetic Turf Council.[2]
Tropicana Field with its artificial turf field.An artificial-turf field at a high school in Oregon.
Artificial turf was first used in Major League Baseball in the Houston Astrodome in 1966, replacing the grass field used when the stadium opened a year earlier. Even though the grass was specifically bred for indoor use, the dome's semi-transparent Lucite ceiling panels, which had been painted white to cut down on glare that bothered the players, did not pass enough sunlight to support the grass. For most of the 1965 season, the Astros played on green-painted dirt and dead grass.
The solution was to install a new type of artificial grass on the field, ChemGrass, which became known as AstroTurf. Given its early use, the term astroturf has since been genericized as a term for any artificial turf.[3] Because the supply of AstroTurf was still low, only a limited amount was available for the first home game. There was not enough for the entire outfield, but there was enough to cover the traditional grass portion of the infield. The outfield remained painted dirt until after the All-Star Break. The team was sent on an extended road trip before the break, and on July 19, 1966, the installation of the outfield portion of AstroTurf was completed.
The Chicago White Sox became the first team to install artificial turf in an outdoor stadium, as they used it only in the infield and adjacent foul territory at Comiskey Park from 1969 through 1975.[4] Artificial turf was later installed in other new multi-purpose stadiums such as Pittsburgh's Three Rivers Stadium, Philadelphia's Veterans Stadium, and Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium. Early AstroTurf baseball fields used the traditional all-dirt path, but starting in 1970 with Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium,[5] teams began using the "base cutout" layout on the diamond, with the only dirt being on the pitcher's mound, batter's circle, and in a five-sided diamond-shaped "sliding box" around each base. With this layout, a painted arc would indicate where the edge of the outfield grass would normally be, to assist fielders in positioning themselves properly. The last stadium in MLB to use this configuration was Rogers Centre in Toronto, when they switched to an all-dirt infield (but keeping the artificial turf) for the 2016 season.[6][7]
Artificial turf being installed on a baseball field in Queens, New York City.
The biggest difference in play on artificial turf was that the ball bounced higher than on real grass and also traveled faster, causing infielders to play farther back than they would normally so that they would have sufficient time to react. The ball also had a truer bounce than on grass so that on long throws fielders could deliberately bounce the ball in front of the player they were throwing to, with the certainty that it would travel in a straight line and not be deflected to the right or left. The biggest impact on the game of "turf", as it came to be called, was on the bodies of the players. The artificial surface, which was generally placed over a concrete base, had much less give to it than a traditional dirt and grass field did, which caused more wear-and-tear on knees, ankles, feet, and the lower back, possibly even shortening the careers of those players who played a significant portion of their games on artificial surfaces. Players also complained that the turf was much hotter than grass, sometimes causing the metal spikes to burn their feet or plastic ones to melt. These factors eventually provoked a number of stadiums, such as the Kansas City Royals' Kauffman Stadium, to switch from artificial turf back to natural grass.
In 2000, St. Petersburg's Tropicana Field became the first MLB field to use a third-generation artificial surface, FieldTurf. All other remaining artificial turf stadiums were either converted to third-generation surfaces or were replaced entirely by new natural grass stadiums. In a span of 13 years, between 1992 and 2005, the National League went from having half of its teams using artificial turf to all of them playing on natural grass. With the replacement of Minneapolis's Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome by Target Field in 2010, only two MLB stadiums used artificial turf from 2010 through 2018: Tropicana Field and Toronto's Rogers Centre. This number grew to three when the Arizona Diamondbacks switched Chase Field to artificial turf for the 2019 season; the stadium had grass from its opening in 1998 until 2018, but the difficulty of maintaining the grass in the stadium, which has a retractable roof and is located in a desert city, was cited as the reason for the switch.[8] In 2020, Miami's Marlins Park (now loanDepot Park) also switched to artificial turf for similar reasons, while the Texas Rangers' new Globe Life Field was opened with an artificial surface, as it is also a retractable roof ballpark in a hot weather city; this puts the number of teams using synthetic turf in MLB at five as of 2023.
In 2002, CenturyLink Field, originally planned to have a natural grass field, was instead surfaced with FieldTurf upon positive reaction from the Seattle Seahawks when they played on the surface at their temporary home of Husky Stadium during the 2000 and 2001 seasons. This would be the first of a leaguewide trend taking place over the next several seasons that would not only result in teams already using artificial surfaces for their fields switching to the new FieldTurf or other similar surfaces but would also see several teams playing on grass adopt a new surface. (The Indianapolis Colts' RCA Dome and the St. Louis Rams' Edward Jones Dome were the last two stadiums in the NFL to replace their first-generation AstroTurf surfaces for next-generation ones after the 2004 season). For example, after a three-year experiment with a natural surface, Giants Stadium went to FieldTurf for 2003, while M&T Bank Stadium added its own artificial surface the same year (it has since been removed and replaced with a natural surface, which the stadium had before installing the turf). Later examples include Paul Brown Stadium (now Paycor Stadium), which went from grass to turf in 2004; Gillette Stadium, which made the switch in 2006;[9] and NRG Stadium, which did so in 2015. As of 2021, 14 NFL fields out of 30 are artificial. NFL players overwhelmingly prefer natural grass over synthetic surfaces, according to a league survey conducted in 2010. When asked, "Which surface do you think is more likely to shorten your career?", 90% responded artificial turf.[10] When players were asked "Is the Turf versus Grass debate overblown or a real concern"[11] in an anonymous player survey, 83% believe it is a real concern while 12.3% believe it is overblown.
Following receiver Odell Beckham Jr.'s injury during Super Bowl LVI, other NFL players started calling for turf to be banned since the site of the game, SoFi Stadium, was a turf field.[12]
Arena football is played indoors on the older short-pile artificial turf.
The first professional Canadian football stadium to use artificial turf was Empire Stadium in Vancouver, British Columbia, then home of the Canadian Football League's BC Lions, which installed 3M TartanTurf in 1970. Today, eight of the nine stadiums in the CFL currently use artificial turf, largely because of the harsh weather conditions in the latter-half of the season. The only one that does not is BMO Field in Toronto, which initially had an artificial pitch and has been shared by the CFL's Toronto Argonauts since 2016 (part of the endzones at that stadium are covered with artificial turf).[13] The first stadium to use the next-generation surface was Ottawa's Frank Clair Stadium (now TD Place Stadium), which the Ottawa Renegades used when they began play in 2002. The Saskatchewan Roughriders' Taylor Field was the only major professional sports venue in North America to use a second-generation artificial playing surface, Omniturf, which was used from 1988 to 2000, followed by AstroTurf from 2000 to 2007 and FieldTurf from 2007 to its 2016 closure.[14]
Some cricket pitches are made of synthetic grass[15] or of a hybrid of mostly natural and some artificial grass, with these "hybrid pitches" having been implemented across several parts of the United Kingdom[16] and Australia.[17] The first synthetic turf cricket field in the USA was opened in Fremont, California in 2016.[18]
The introduction of synthetic surfaces has significantly changed the sport of field hockey. Since being introduced in the 1970s, competitions in western countries are now mostly played on artificial surfaces. This has increased the speed of the game considerably and changed the shape of hockey sticks to allow for different techniques, such as reverse stick trapping and hitting.
Field hockey artificial turf differs from artificial turf for other sports, in that it does not try to reproduce a grass feel, being made of shorter fibers. This allows the improvement in speed brought by earlier artificial turfs to be retained. This development is problematic for areas which cannot afford to build an extra artificial field for hockey alone. The International Hockey Federation and manufacturers are driving research in order to produce new fields that will be suitable for a variety of sports.
The use of artificial turf in conjunction with changes in the game's rules (e.g., the removal of offside, introduction of rolling substitutes and the self-pass, and to the interpretation of obstruction) have contributed significantly to change the nature of the game, greatly increasing the speed and intensity of play as well as placing far greater demands on the conditioning of the players.
Aspmyra, Norway: home of the football club FK Bodø/GlimtA slide tackle driving up crumbed rubber in the playing surface
The use of artificial turf, and whether they are not allowed or not, varies between different tournaments and time periods. Though grass is preferred in general in association football, artificial turf is found in areas where it is seen as impractical to maintain natural grass season-long, with causes including very cold climates (For instance Norway's Eliteserien) or multi-purpose stadiums (Seattle's Lumen Field).
Some association football clubs in Europe installed synthetic surfaces in the 1980s, which were called "plastic pitches" (often derisively) in countries such as England. There, four professional club venues had adopted them; Queens Park Rangers's Loftus Road (1981–1988), Luton Town's Kenilworth Road (1985–1991), Oldham Athletic's Boundary Park (1986–1991) and Preston North End's Deepdale (1986–1994). QPR had been the first team to install an artificial pitch at their stadium in 1981, but were the first to remove it when they did so in 1988.
Artificial pitches were banned from top-flight (then First Division) football in 1991, forcing Oldham Athletic to remove their artificial pitch after their promotion to the First Division in 1991, while then top-flight Luton Town also removed their artificial pitch at the same time. The last Football League team to have an artificial pitch in England was Preston North End, who removed their pitch in 1994 after eight years in use. Artificial pitches were banned from the top four divisions from 1995.
Artificial turf gained a bad reputation[neutrality is disputed] globally, with fans and especially with players. The first-generation artificial turf surfaces were carpet-like in their look and feel, and thus, a far harder surface than grass and soon became known[by whom?] as an unforgiving playing surface that was prone to cause more injuries, and in particular, more serious joint injuries, than would comparatively be suffered on a grass surface. This turf was also regarded as aesthetically unappealing to many fans[weasel words].
In 1981, London football club Queens Park Rangers dug up its grass pitch and installed an artificial one. Others followed, and by the mid-1980s there were four artificial surfaces in operation in the English league. They soon became a national joke: the ball pinged round like it was made of rubber, the players kept losing their footing, and anyone who fell over risked carpet burns. Unsurprisingly, fans complained that the football was awful to watch and, one by one, the clubs returned to natural grass.[21]
In November 2011, it was reported that a number of English football clubs were interested in using artificial pitches again on economic grounds.[22] As of January 2020, artificial pitches are not permitted in the Premier League or Football League but are permitted in the National League and lower divisions. Bromley are an example of an English football club who currently use a third-generation artificial pitch.[23] In 2018, Sutton United were close to achieving promotion to the Football League and the debate in England about artificial pitches resurfaced again. It was reported that, if Sutton won promotion, they would subsequently be demoted two leagues if they refused to replace their pitch with natural grass.[24] After Harrogate Town's promotion to the Football League in 2020, the club was obliged to install a natural grass pitch at Wetherby Road;[25] and after winning promotion in 2021 Sutton Utd were also obliged to tear up their artificial pitch and replace it with grass, at a cost of more than £500,000.[26] Artificial pitches are permitted in all rounds of the FA Cup competition.
In the 1990s, many North American soccer clubs also removed their artificial surfaces and re-installed grass, while others moved to new stadiums with state-of-the-art grass surfaces that were designed to withstand cold temperatures where the climate demanded it. The use of artificial turf was later banned by FIFA, UEFA and by many domestic football associations, but FIFA and UEFA allowed it again from the mid-2000's (UEFA from the 2005–06 season onwards), provided that the turfs are FIFA Recommended. UEFA has now been heavily involved in programs to test artificial turf, with tests made in several grounds meeting with FIFA approval. A team of UEFA, FIFA and German company Polytan conducted tests in the Stadion Salzburg Wals-Siezenheim in Salzburg, Austria which had matches played on it in UEFA Euro 2008. It is the second FIFA 2 Star approved artificial turf in a European domestic top flight, after Dutch club Heracles Almelo received the FIFA certificate in August 2005.[27] The tests were approved.[28]
FIFA originally launched its FIFA Quality Concept in February 2001.
A full international fixture for the 2008 European Championships was played on October 17, 2007, between England and Russia on an artificial surface, which was installed to counteract adverse weather conditions, at the Luzhniki Stadium in Moscow.[29][30] It was one of the first full international games to be played on such a surface approved by FIFA and UEFA. The latter ordered the 2008 European Champions League final hosted in the same stadium in May 2008 to place on grass, so a temporary natural grass field was installed just for the final.
In 2007, UEFA stressed that artificial turf should only be considered an option where climatic conditions necessitate.[31] One Desso "hybrid grass" product incorporates both natural grass and artificial elements.[32]
FIFA designated a star system for artificial turf fields that have undergone a series of tests that examine quality and performance based on a two star system.[34] Recommended two-star fields may be used for FIFA Final Round Competitions as well as for UEFA Europa League and Champions League matches.[35] There are currently 130 FIFA Recommended 2-Star installations in the world.[36]
In 2009, FIFA launched the Preferred Producer Initiative to improve the quality of artificial football turf at each stage of the life cycle (manufacturing, installation and maintenance).[37] Currently, there are five manufacturers that were selected by FIFA: Act Global, Limonta, Desso, GreenFields, and Edel Grass. These firms have made quality guarantees directly to FIFA and have agreed to increased research and development.
In 2010, Estadio Omnilife with an artificial turf opened in Guadalajara to be the new home of Chivas, one of the most popular teams in Mexico. The owner of Chivas, Jorge Vergara, defended the reasoning behind using artificial turf because the stadium was designed to be "environment friendly and as such, having grass would result [in] using too much water."[38] Some players criticized the field, saying its harder surface caused many injuries. When Johan Cruyff became the adviser of the team, he recommended the switch to natural grass, which the team did in 2012.[39]
The 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup took place entirely on artificial surfaces, as the event was played in Canada, where almost all of the country's stadiums use artificial turf due to climate issues. This plan garnered criticism from players and fans, some believing the artificial surfaces make players more susceptible to injuries. Over fifty of the female athletes protested against the use of artificial turf on the basis of gender discrimination.[40][41]Australia winger Caitlin Foord said that after playing 90 minutes there was no difference to her post-match recovery – a view shared by the rest of the squad. The squad spent much time preparing on the surface and had no problems with its use in Winnipeg. "We've been training on [artificial] turf pretty much all year so I think we're kind of used to it in that way ... I think grass or turf you can still pull up sore after a game so it's definitely about getting the recovery in and getting it right", Foord said.[42] A lawsuit was filed on October 1, 2014, in an Ontario tribunal court by a group of women's international soccer players against FIFA and the Canadian Soccer Association and specifically points out that in 1994 FIFA spent $2 million to plant natural grass over artificial turf in New Jersey and Detroit.[43] Various celebrities showed their support for the women soccer players in defense of their lawsuit, including actor Tom Hanks, NBA player Kobe Bryant and U.S. men's soccer team keeper Tim Howard. Even with the possibility of boycotts, FIFA's head of women's competitions, Tatjana Haenni, made it clear that "we play on artificial turf and there's no Plan B."[44][45]
In UEFA tournaments, teams who are used to playing on artificial turf are seen as having a large home advantage against teams who don't, as was the case for Bodø/Glimt's semi-final campaign in the 2024–25 UEFA Europa League.[48]
Carpet has been used as a surface for indoor tennis courts for decades, though the first carpets used were more similar to home carpets than a synthetic grass. After the introduction of AstroTurf, it came to be used for tennis courts, both indoor and outdoor, though only a small minority of courts use the surface.[49][50] Both infill and non-infill versions are used, and are typically considered medium-fast to fast surfaces under the International Tennis Federation's classification scheme.[49] A distinct form found in tennis is an "artificial clay" surface,[49] which seeks to simulate a clay court by using a very short pile carpet with an infill of the same loose aggregate used for clay courts that rises above the carpet fibers.[49]
Tennis courts such as Wimbledon are considering using an artificial hybrid grass to replace their natural lawn courts. Such systems incorporate synthetic fibers into natural grass to create a more durable surface on which to play.[51] Such hybrid surfaces are currently used for some association football stadiums, including Wembley Stadium.
Synthetic turf can also be used in the golf industry, such as on driving ranges, putting greens and even in some circumstances tee boxes. For low budget courses, particularly those catering to casual golfers, synthetic putting greens offer the advantage of being a relatively cheap alternative to installing and maintaining grass greens, but are much more similar to real grass in appearance and feel compared to sand greens which are the traditional alternative surface. Because of the vast areas of golf courses and the damage from clubs during shots, it is not feasible to surface fairways with artificial turf.
Artificial grass is used to line the perimeter of some sections of some motor circuits, and offers less grip than some other surfaces.[52] It can pose an obstacle to drivers if it gets caught on their car.[53]
Since the early 1990s, the use of synthetic grass in the more arid western states of the United States has moved beyond athletic fields to residential and commercial landscaping.[54] New water saving programs, as of 2019, which grant rebates for turf removal, do not accept artificial turf as replacement and require a minimum of plants.[55][56]
The use of artificial grass for convenience sometimes faces opposition: Legislation frequently seeks to preserve natural gardens and fully water permeable surfaces, therefore restricting the use of hardscape and plantless areas, including artificial turf. In several locations in different countries, homeowners have been fined, ordered to remove artificial turf and/or had to defend themselves in courts. Many of these restrictions can be found in local bylaws and ordinances. These not always applied in a consistent manner,[57][58][59] especially in municipalities that utilize a complaint-based model for enforcing local laws.
Sunlight reflections from nearby windows can cause artificial turf to melt. This can be avoided by adding perforated vinyl privacy window film adhesive to the outside of the window causing the reflection.
Artificial turf has been used at airports.[60] Here it provides several advantages over natural turf – it does not support wildlife, it has high visual contrast with runways in all seasons, it reduces foreign object damage (FOD) since the surface has no rocks or clumps, and it drains well.[61]
Some artificial turf systems allow for the integration of fiber-optic fibers into the turf. This would allow for runway lighting to be embedded in artificial landing surfaces for aircraft (or lighting or advertisements to be directly embedded in a playing surface).[62]
Artificial turf is commonly used for tanks containing octopusses, in particular the Giant Pacific octopus since it is a reliable way to prevent the octopusses from escaping their tank, as they prevent the suction cups on the tentacles from getting a tight seal.[63]
The first major academic review of the environmental and health risks and benefits of artificial turf was published in 2014;[64] it was followed by extensive research on possible risks to human health, but holistic analyses of the environmental footprint of artificial turf compared with natural turf only began to emerge in the 2020s,[65][66] and frameworks to support informed policymaking were still lacking.[67][68] Evaluating the relative environmental footprints of natural and artificial turf is complex, with outcomes depending on a wide range of factors, including (to give the example of a sports field):[64]
what ecosystem services are lost by converting a site to a sports pitch
how resource-intensive is the landscaping work and transport of materials to create a pitch
whether input materials are recycled and whether these are recycled again at the end of the pitch's life
how resource-intensive and damaging maintenance is (whether through water, fertiliser, weed-killer, reapplication of rubber crumb, snow-clearing, etc.)
how intensively the facility is used, for how long, and whether surface type can reduce the overall number of pitches required
Artificial turf has been shown to contribute to global warming by absorbing significantly more radiation than living turf and, to a lesser extent, by displacing living plants that could sequester carbon dioxide through photosynthesis;[69] a study at New Mexico State University found that in that environment, water-cooling of artificial turf can demand as much water as natural turf.[70] However, a 2022 study that used real-world data to model a ten-year-life-cycle environmental footprint for a new natural-turf soccer field compared with an artificial-turf field found that the natural-turf field contributed twice as much to global warming as the artificial one (largely due to a more resource-intensive construction phase), while finding that the artificial turf would likely cause more pollution of other kinds. It promoted improvements to usual practice such as the substitution of cork for rubber in artificial pitches and more drought-resistant grasses and electric mowing in natural ones.[65] In 2021, a Zurich University of Applied Sciences study for the city of Zurich, using local data on extant pitches, found that, per hour of use, natural turf had the lowest environmental footprint, followed by artificial turf with no infill, and then artificial turf using an infill (e.g. granulated rubber). However, because it could tolerate more hours of use, unfilled artificial turf often had the lowest environmental footprint in practice, by reducing the total number of pitches required. The study recommended optimising the use of existing pitches before building new ones, and choosing the best surface for the likely intensity of use.[66] Another suggestion is the introduction of green roofs to offset the conversion of grassland to artificial turf.[71]
Contrary to popular belief, artificial turf is not maintenance free. It requires regular maintenance, such as raking and patching, to keep it functional and safe.[72]
Some artificial turf uses infill such as silicon sand, but most uses granulated rubber, referred to as "crumb rubber". Granulated rubber can be made from recycled car tires and may carry heavy metals, PFAS chemicals, and other chemicals of environmental concern. The synthetic fibers of artificial turf are also subject to degradation. Thus chemicals from artificial turfs leach into the environment, and artificial turf is a source of microplasticspollution and rubber pollution in air, fresh-water, sea and soil environments.[73][74][75][76][77][78][64][excessive citations] In Norway, Sweden, and at least some other places, the rubber granulate from artificial turf infill constitutes the second largest source of microplastics in the environment after the tire and road wear particles that make up a large portion of the fine road debris.[79][80][81] As early as 2007, Environment and Human Health, Inc., a lobby-group, proposed a moratorium on the use of ground-up rubber tires in fields and playgrounds based on health concerns;[82] in September 2022, the European Commission made a draft proposal to restrict the use of microplastic granules as infill in sports fields.[83]
What is less clear is how likely this pollution is in practice to harm humans or other organisms and whether these environmental costs outweigh the benefits of artificial turf, with many scientific papers and government agencies (such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency) calling for more research.[2] A 2018 study published in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution analyzed the chemicals found in samples of tire crumbs, some used to install school athletic fields, and identified 92 chemicals only about half of which had ever been studied for their health effects and some of which are known to be carcinogenic or irritants. It stated "caution would argue against use of these materials where human exposure is likely, and this is especially true for playgrounds and athletic playing fields where young people may be affected".[84] Conversely, a 2017 study in Sports Medicine argued that "regular physical activity during adolescence and early adulthood helps prevent cancer later in life. Restricting the use or availability of all-weather year-round synthetic fields and thereby potentially reducing exercise could, in the long run, actually increase cancer incidence, as well as cardiovascular disease and other chronic illnesses."[85]
The possibility that carcinogenic substances in artificial turf could increase risks of human cancer (the artificial turf–cancer hypothesis) gained a particularly high profile in the first decades of the twenty-first century and attracted extensive study, with scientific reports around 2020 finding cancer-risks in modern artificial turf negligible.[86][87][88][89] But concerns have extended to other human-health risks, such as endocrine disruption that might affect early puberty, obesity, and children's attention spans.[90][91][92][93] Potential harm to fish[75] and earthworm[94] populations has also been shown.
A study for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection analyzed lead and other metals in dust kicked into the air by physical activity on five artificial turf fields. The results suggest that even low levels of activity on the field can cause particulate matter containing these chemicals to get into the air where it can be inhaled and be harmful. The authors state that since no level of lead exposure is considered safe for children, "only a comprehensive mandated testing of fields can provide assurance that no health hazard on these fields exists from lead or other metals used in their construction and maintenance."[95]
A number of health and safety concerns have been raised about artificial turf.[2] Friction between skin and older generations of artificial turf can cause abrasions and/or burns to a much greater extent than natural grass.[96] Artificial turf tends to retain heat from the sun and can be much hotter than natural grass with prolonged exposure to the sun.[97]
There is some evidence that periodic disinfection of artificial turf is required as pathogens are not broken down by natural processes in the same manner as natural grass. Despite this, a 2006 study suggests certain microbial life is less active in artificial turf.[96]
There is evidence showing higher rates of player injury on artificial turf. By November 1971, the injury toll on first-generation artificial turf had reached a threshold that resulted in congressional hearings by the House subcommittee on commerce and finance.[98][99][100] In a study performed by the National Football League Injury and Safety Panel, published in the October 2012 issue of the American Journal of Sports Medicine, Elliott B. Hershman et al. reviewed injury data from NFL games played between 2000 and 2009, finding that "the injury rate of knee sprains as a whole was 22% higher on FieldTurf than on natural grass. While MCL sprains did not occur at a rate significantly higher than on grass, rates of ACL sprains were 67% higher on FieldTurf."[101]Metatarsophalangeal joint sprain, known as "turf toe" when the big toe is involved, is named from the injury being associated with playing sports on rigid surfaces such as artificial turf and is a fairly common injury among professional American football players. Artificial turf is a harder surface than grass and does not have much "give" when forces are placed on it.[102]
^ abDave Brady, "It's All So Artificial: The Uncommon Ground", Petersen's 12th Pro Football Annual, 1972. Los Angeles: Petersen Publishing Co., 1972; pp. 62–65.
^ abcd
Weeks, Jennifer (2015). "Turf Wars". Distillations Magazine. 1 (3): 34–37. Archived from the original on March 21, 2018. Retrieved March 22, 2018.
^"Definition of Astroturf – Dictionary.com". dictionary.com. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023. This sense of the word has come to be frequently used as a generic term for any artificial turf (in the same way that other brand names have been genericized, such as xerox). When used this way, it's often seen in lowercase (astroturf).
^"History". Saskatchewan Roughriders. June 12, 2002. Retrieved January 10, 2021. In 1988, the Roughriders replaced the first artificial turf with a new type of system called OmniTurf. Unlike AstroTurf, OmniTurf was an inlay turf system, which relied on 300 tons of sand to hold it in place (rather than the traditional glued-down system). Over the years, a number of problems occurred with this system and it eventually became necessary to replace it prior to its usable age being reached.
^ abcCheng H, Hu Y, Reinhard M (2014). "Environmental and health impacts of artificial turf: a review"(PDF). Environ Sci Technol. 48 (4): 2114–29. doi:10.1021/es4044193. PMID24467230. Archived from the original(PDF) on March 29, 2024. Retrieved July 1, 2023. The major concerns stem from the infill material that is typically derived from scrap tires. Tire rubber crumb contains a range of organic contaminants and heavy metals that can volatilize into the air and/or leach into the percolating rainwater, thereby posing a potential risk to the environment and human health.
^Golden, Leslie M. (2021) "The Contribution of Artificial Turf to Global Warming," Sustainability and Climate Change, December,14 (6) 436-449; http://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2021.0038
^"Microplastics in agricultural soils: A reason to worry?". Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA). February 3, 2017. Archived from the original on April 19, 2017. Retrieved April 19, 2017. Microplastics are increasingly seen as an environmental problem of global proportions. While the focus to date has been on microplastics in the ocean and their effects on marine life, microplastics in soils have largely been overlooked. Researchers are concerned about the lack of knowledge regarding potential consequences of microplastics in agricultural landscapes from application of sewage sludge.
^"Tire wear foremost source of microplastics". IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. March 29, 2016. Archived from the original on April 19, 2017. Retrieved April 19, 2017. researchers have ranked the sources of microplastic particles by size. The amount of microplastic particles emitted by traffic is estimated to 13 500 tonnes per year. Artificial turf ranks as the second largest source of emissions and is responsible for approximately 2300-3900 tonnes per year.
^Brown, Sc.D., David R. (2007). Artificial Turf(PDF) (Report). The Board of Environment & Human Health, Inc. Archived from the original(PDF) on April 10, 2008. Retrieved December 21, 2007.
^Shalat SL. An evaluation of potential exposures to lead and other metals as the result of aerosolized particulate matter from artificial turf playing fields. 2011. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. http://www.nj.gov/dep/dsr/publications/artificial-turf-report.pdf
^Williams, C. Frank; Pulley, Gilbert E. (2002). Synthetic Surface Heat Studies(PDF) (Report). Brigham Young University. Archived(PDF) from the original on April 10, 2008. Retrieved February 19, 2008.
This article incorporates text by National Center for Health Research available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license. The text and its release have been received by the Wikimedia Volunteer Response Team
